The Incision Point

The Incision Point

🔍 Research

The TKA Prom Shift: 140 Matched Cohorts Reveal the Truth About Patellar Retention

An orthopedic surgeon's data-driven blueprint for identifying which patellae to safely retain and how to surgically optimize the unresurfaced patellofemoral track.

Dr. Michael Meneghini's avatar
Dr. Michael Meneghini
Sep 07, 2026
∙ Paid

Managing the patella remains one of the most polarizing technical decisions in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Historically, the orthopedic dogma was straightforward: if a patient’s patella exhibited severe, “bone-on-bone” osteoarthritis or significant eburnation, the surgeon was obligated to perform a routine resurfacing with a cemented polyethylene button. Failure to do so was presumed to guarantee debilitating post-operative anterior knee pain and a high likelihood of a secondary revision.

However, as implant engineering has drastically evolved over the past decade, a major clinical paradigm shift has occurred. The advent of modern, “patella-friendly” femoral components characterized by significantly deepened trochlear grooves and asymmetric, laterally elevated facets has dramatically reduced retropatellar contact stress. Armed with these advanced designs, a growing segment of high-volume surgeons has adopted “selective patellar resurfacing,” leaving the vast majority of native patellae untouched.

Subscribe to help me disrupt the current status quo in our broken healthcare system… and to access my 20+ years of medical research.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Dr. Michael Meneghini.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Michael Meneghini · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture